<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nathanael Jones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanaeljones.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanaeljones.com</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a computer linguist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Resizer &#8211; Configuring IIS by Nathanael Jones</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/131/image-resizer-configuring-iis/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=131#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Individual mappings seem to be very problematic... If wildcard mapping isn&#039;t an option, I&#039;d suggest the .ashx/.axd alternative syntax...  
 
Every version of IIS seems to be buggy regarding individual mappings...  
 
There are a few things you could try... make sure NTFS permissions on both the image and the imagecache folder are set properly for both the IIS account AND the ASP.NET account. Verify the mapping is a script engine mapping...  Check your URL authorization in web.config for bugs, and verify Anonoymous authentication works properly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individual mappings seem to be very problematic&#8230; If wildcard mapping isn&#039;t an option, I&#039;d suggest the .ashx/.axd alternative syntax&#8230;  </p>
<p>Every version of IIS seems to be buggy regarding individual mappings&#8230;  </p>
<p>There are a few things you could try&#8230; make sure NTFS permissions on both the image and the imagecache folder are set properly for both the IIS account AND the ASP.NET account. Verify the mapping is a script engine mapping&#8230;  Check your URL authorization in web.config for bugs, and verify Anonoymous authentication works properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Resizer &#8211; Configuring IIS by Cult</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/131/image-resizer-configuring-iis/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Cult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=131#comment-453</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using webhost4life, which I think is running IIS6. They have a control panel option to add a script map for *.jpg to go to ASP.NET, but when I do that all requests to jpgs on the site forward to the login screen. Only the /admin path is secured through. I can actually see the jpgs appearing in the imagecache, so I know the module is running and working fine, it is just that ASP.NET thinks the request should be authenticated for some reason. Has anyone seen this happen before? Do you know what setting might cause that to occur? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m using webhost4life, which I think is running IIS6. They have a control panel option to add a script map for *.jpg to go to ASP.NET, but when I do that all requests to jpgs on the site forward to the login screen. Only the /admin path is secured through. I can actually see the jpgs appearing in the imagecache, so I know the module is running and working fine, it is just that ASP.NET thinks the request should be authenticated for some reason. Has anyone seen this happen before? Do you know what setting might cause that to occur?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extending Page: Adding Metadata and Stylesheet management by Referencing stylesheets, scripts from content pages&#160;&#124;&#160;Nathanael Jones</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/152/extending-page-adding-metadata-and-stylesheet-management/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Referencing stylesheets, scripts from content pages&#160;&#124;&#160;Nathanael Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=152#comment-443</guid>
		<description>[...] A more comprehensive subclass that allows runtime management of stylesheets and metadata. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A more comprehensive subclass that allows runtime management of stylesheets and metadata. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Version 2.1b released! by Nathanael Jones</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/438/version-2-1b-released/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanaeljones.com/?p=438#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is - you should have received an e-mail with the download link a few weeks back. (The e-mail address it was purchased under).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is &#8211; you should have received an e-mail with the download link a few weeks back. (The e-mail address it was purchased under).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Version 2.1b released! by emilioz</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/438/version-2-1b-released/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>emilioz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanaeljones.com/?p=438#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Is the upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1 free???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1 free???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Version 2.1b released! by Bubba</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/438/version-2-1b-released/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanaeljones.com/?p=438#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Is the upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1 free?   If so how does one download it without going to paypal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1 free?   If so how does one download it without going to paypal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Resizer &#8211; Configuring IIS by Nathanael Jones</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/131/image-resizer-configuring-iis/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=131#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I&#039;ve corrected the documention to include 64-bit... Somehow I completely overlooked that situation when writing this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I&#8217;ve corrected the documention to include 64-bit&#8230; Somehow I completely overlooked that situation when writing this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Resizer v2 Examples by Nathanael Jones</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/155/image-resizer-v2-examples/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=155#comment-384</guid>
		<description>WatermarkSettings.cs allows you to write your own watermarking code based on any parameters you want.

However, what you would need to do for &#039;hotlinked&#039; requests is to do an HTTP redirect to add something to the querystring. 

Caching is URL-based, so you have to change the URL to get a watermarked version. 

I&#039;m assuming you got the CRC error fixed using a different tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WatermarkSettings.cs allows you to write your own watermarking code based on any parameters you want.</p>
<p>However, what you would need to do for &#8216;hotlinked&#8217; requests is to do an HTTP redirect to add something to the querystring. </p>
<p>Caching is URL-based, so you have to change the URL to get a watermarked version. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming you got the CRC error fixed using a different tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Resizer &#8211; Configuring IIS by Simon</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/131/image-resizer-configuring-iis/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=131#comment-382</guid>
		<description>We had everything working on our 32bit II7 install using

add name=&quot;ASPNET&quot; path=&quot;*&quot; verb=&quot;*&quot; modules=&quot;IsapiModule&quot; scriptProcessor=&quot;%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_isapi.dll&quot; resourceType=&quot;Unspecified&quot; requireAccess=&quot;None&quot; preCondition=&quot;classicMode,runtimeVersionv2.0,bitness32&quot;

But when we deployed onto our 64 bit IIS7 sever we needed to change the settings to

add name=&quot;ASPNET&quot; path=&quot;*&quot; verb=&quot;*&quot; modules=&quot;IsapiModule&quot; scriptProcessor=&quot;%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v2.0.50727\aspnet_isapi.dll&quot; resourceType=&quot;Unspecified&quot; requireAccess=&quot;None&quot; preCondition=&quot;classicMode,runtimeVersionv2.0,bitness64&quot;

This is not realy my area, but the changes seem to work....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had everything working on our 32bit II7 install using</p>
<p>add name=&#8221;ASPNET&#8221; path=&#8221;*&#8221; verb=&#8221;*&#8221; modules=&#8221;IsapiModule&#8221; scriptProcessor=&#8221;%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_isapi.dll&#8221; resourceType=&#8221;Unspecified&#8221; requireAccess=&#8221;None&#8221; preCondition=&#8221;classicMode,runtimeVersionv2.0,bitness32&#8243;</p>
<p>But when we deployed onto our 64 bit IIS7 sever we needed to change the settings to</p>
<p>add name=&#8221;ASPNET&#8221; path=&#8221;*&#8221; verb=&#8221;*&#8221; modules=&#8221;IsapiModule&#8221; scriptProcessor=&#8221;%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v2.0.50727\aspnet_isapi.dll&#8221; resourceType=&#8221;Unspecified&#8221; requireAccess=&#8221;None&#8221; preCondition=&#8221;classicMode,runtimeVersionv2.0,bitness64&#8243;</p>
<p>This is not realy my area, but the changes seem to work&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Resizer v2 Examples by Josh</title>
		<link>http://nathanaeljones.com/155/image-resizer-v2-examples/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.29.219.39/?p=155#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Would you be able to add the ability to display a watermark on the image using the querystring? or better yet display the watermark only when the request does not come from within the site itself (prevent hotlinking)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you be able to add the ability to display a watermark on the image using the querystring? or better yet display the watermark only when the request does not come from within the site itself (prevent hotlinking)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
